Accurate measurement of magnetic fields is very important for understanding the formation and evolution of solar magnetic fields. Currently, there are two types of solar magnetic field measurement instruments: filter-based magnetographs and Stokes polarimeters. The former gives high temporal resolution magnetograms and the latter provides more accurate measurements of magnetic fields. Calibrating the magnetograms obtained by filter-based magnetographs with those obtained by Stokes polarimeters is a good way to combine the advantages of the two types. Our previous studies have shown that, compared to the magnetograms obtained by the Spectro-Polarimeter (SP) on board Hinode, those magnetograms obtained by both the filter-based Solar Magnetic Field Telescope (SMFT) of the Huairou Solar Observing Station and by the filter-based Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI) aboard SOHO have underestimated the flux densities in their magnetograms and systematic center-to-limb variations present in the magnetograms of both instruments. Here, using a sample of 75 vector magnetograms of stable alpha sunspots, we compare the vector magnetograms obtained by the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) aboard Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) with co-temporal vector magnetograms acquired by SP/Hinode. Our analysis shows that both the longitudinal and transverse flux densities in the HMI/SDO magnetograms are very close to those in the SP/Hinode magnetograms and the systematic center-to-limb variations in the HMI/SDO magnetograms are very minor. Our study suggests that using a filter-based magnetograph to construct a low spectral resolution Stokes profile, as done by HMI/SDO, can largely remove the disadvantages of the filter-type measurements and yet still possess the advantage of high temporal resolution.

There are currently no refbacks.